This lecture concentrated on reconstruction algorithms for sharp changes. I concentrated mainly on Monotonicity method and Factorization. I referred to the slides for a talk given in Korea in 2006, so you will need this open to follow as it is not easy to see on the video.
There are references at the end of the slides, but for factorization method there are some more recent work that might be a better place to start.
I did not go in to TV that much but there are more details on the slides.
Videos All in one file, Or in chunks part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.
Here is the web interface Brühl's factorization code.
An informal course on reconstruction algorithms in electrical impedance tomography for starting PhD students
Friday, 29 October 2010
Sunday, 24 October 2010
Lecture 5: drive and measurement patterns
This was a bit unplanned but following a phone call to Andy Adler on Thursday I decided to talk about drive and measurement patterns, so it if it seems a bit rambling and unplanned it was.
Videos here part1, part2, part3,part4.
Some links mentioned in the notes
Videos here part1, part2, part3,part4.
Some links mentioned in the notes
- Loke's manual for RES3DINV at GeoTomo
- W Lionheart, N.Polydordes and A Borsic, The reconstruction problem, Part 1 of Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications, (ed) D S Holder, Institute of Physics, p3-64, 2004. ISBN: 0750309520 . Get a copy on MIMS e-print: 2006.421
- Look at page 360 of this paper and see the SVD for adjacent versus opposite drive.Breckon, W R, Pidcock, M K, Some Mathematical Aspects of Impedance Imaging, Mathematics and Computer Science in Medical Imaging, Ed Viergever and Todd-Pokropek, NATO ASI series F, Vol 39, Springer, 1988. ISBN: 3540186727. You can download the reprint
- Electric Current Computed Tomography and Eigenvalues, SIAM Journal on Applied MathemaicsVol. 50, No. 6 (Dec., 1990), pp. 1623-1634, See paper on JSTOR
- More to come
Friday, 15 October 2010
Lecture 4 Solving the forward problem
Today's topic is solving the forward problem. For the discussion of FEM I will refer to my book chapter in Holder's book with Nick Polydorides and Andrea Borsic (see preprint version). Theses are also useful, Marko Vaukhonen's and Nick Polydorides' (see reading list)
The video (a single AVI) download here
The "cot formula" that relates FEM to resistor networks in 3D appears in our paper from the Florida EIT meeting William R. B. Lionheart and Kyriakos Paridis, Finite Elements and Anisotropic EIT reconstruction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 224, no. 1, p. 012022, 2010
The video (a single AVI) download here
The "cot formula" that relates FEM to resistor networks in 3D appears in our paper from the Florida EIT meeting William R. B. Lionheart and Kyriakos Paridis, Finite Elements and Anisotropic EIT reconstruction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 224, no. 1, p. 012022, 2010
Monday, 11 October 2010
Lecture 3 videos now here
This is just here to trigger your RSS feed or whatever, I'll delete it when people have noticed...I am not yet convinced of this "email lists are so last century" idea and new fangled things like RSS feeds and blogger followers, well we will see how it works.
Yes it is Friday at 11am
We are continuing on Fridays at 11-12, in the same room, except for Nov 26th. We probably wont have a lecture then as the room is booked by someone else and one of my students is being viva'd. We will endeavour to put the lectures on the web the same day but some times (eg this time) it might slip to Monday
Friday, 8 October 2010
Lecture 3
Time for some vector calculus and linear algebra. I started by explaining the so-called Louiville transformation between the conductivity and stationary Schrödinger equation. Then we went on to least squares solution of over determined linear systems, Tikhonov regularization and the SVD.
This material is covered in more detail in my lecture notes for a course we used to teach use the username inverse and the password crime to access this page and look at chapter 3 of the notes.
Video as one avi file, or
part1 part2 part3 part4 part5
Or on YouTube Part 1,
This material is covered in more detail in my lecture notes for a course we used to teach use the username inverse and the password crime to access this page and look at chapter 3 of the notes.
Video as one avi file, or
part1 part2 part3 part4 part5
Or on YouTube Part 1,
Tuesday, 5 October 2010
Monday, 4 October 2010
Lecture 2 the linearization
In this lecture we go through Calderón's Born Neumann series for the forward problem and the linearization that results from truncating the higher order terms. The Fréchet derivative of the Neuman-to-Dirichlet map is derived from Calderón's calculation of the Fréchet derivative of the Dirichlet-toNeumann map with respect to conductivity.
The (high resolution) video is here Lower resolution in chunks part1, part2,part3,part4.
Some helpful resources:
The (high resolution) video is here Lower resolution in chunks part1, part2,part3,part4.
Some helpful resources:
- Calderón's foundational paper you can see the original paper scanned here as well as a reprint with slightly different typing errors.
- If you are confused by the difference between little-o and big-O Wikipedia may help, also definition of the Fréchet derivative
- Martin Hanke has formalised the method of finding an inclusion from Cauchy data at the boundary and describes in his paper On real-time algorithms for the location search of discontinuous conductivities with one measurement
- Have a go at deriving the Born-Neumann series and directly the linearization for the Neumann-to-Dirichlet case. To make it simpler assume that the conductivity does not change in a neighbourhood of the boundary
- How does the argument change for the case of complex conductivity? Clearly you need some complex conjugates around.
- Find the sensitivity/Fréchet derivative for the stationary Schrödinger/variable wave speed Helmholtz equation -∇2 u + c u=0. If c is allowed to be negative you have to assume that it is "non resonant", that is you avoid eigenvalues, then there is a well defined Green's operator. This problem is relevant to ultrasound/seismic imaging, diffuse optical tomography, quantum scattering etc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)